Rulebearing Playground Coverage Schemas GitHub

Adoption review, October 2026: the review that opens wave 4

The entry review of plan 0004, Step 1: the six signals of NFR-ADOPT-01, and which funding outcome of plan 0004 § 1.2 applies. The baseline and the method are in docs/adoption.md.

The signals, 2026-10-10

Measured with scripts/adoption-signals.sh . --repo benbahrenburg/rulebearing --gate self-check --since 2026-09-01 --graph target/cargo-graph.json, plus the nightly's Stop-hook row.

Signal Target after two months benbahrenburg/rulebearing, merged since 2026-09-01
Agent-authored pull requests whose first gate run passes above 90% 100% of 1 (1 of 71 merged detected as agent-authored)
Median pushes from a failing gate run to green one none failed
Rules added by agents that fail test or liveness before merge any number, as long as it is caught 0
p95 of the Stop hook with --affected under 2 seconds 1.875 s over 200 edits on aspnetcore, source mode (nightly run 38021235710); under 2 s on every scheduled night since 2026-10-03
Rules carrying fix above 80% 100% of 5
Merged budget raises zero 0

What the numbers can and cannot say:

The funding outcome

The entry criterion is not met on the evidence. Four signals meet their targets on one repository. The first two, the ones the decision rule turns on, have one data point between them, and nothing has been measured over two consecutive months.

The wave is funded by the owner's decision of 2026-10-10 ("move onto implementing plan 0004-wave-4-reach.md"), ahead of the entry criterion. The decision rule of § 1.2 is therefore not what funds it. It stays the record of what the signals would have decided. The closing review (Step 14) measures the signals again, and says whether the agent features earned their place.

Sub-wave Funded By
4A docs site, playground, cookbook, live tables yes the owner's decision
4B pull-request app and Azure DevOps extension no, deferred the owner's rule of 2026-09-30 (§ 1.2): it waits until the product ships, meaning plans 0001 to 0003 are implemented and a non-placeholder release is on every registry. Publishing is the owner's, still to come
4C fix --plan and the eval harness yes the owner's decision, which the § 1.2 rule alone would not give: the first two signals have not moved because they have not been measured
4D fleet and declared edges yes the owner's decision
4E usage counts and the closing review yes never cut (§ 3)

Before the closing review